Workshop Evaluation Data and Information
for "Designing and Using Rubrics for Classroom and Programmatic Assessment"
2nd National Undergraduate Assessment Symposium
Cary, NC, April 16, 2004
Before you begin: This page contains evaluation data for the workshop or presentation indicated above. These data came directly from the following source: Laura Jacovc, Symposium planner; lmjacovec@gw.fis.ncsu.edu. The data are included here in their entirety, in the form in which they were collected and reported, including all narrative comments.
The following chart shows each question on the symposium evaluation form. In
the first box after the question appears the average of the results for that
question (based on a scale of 1-5, as shown below). 5.0 is the highest score
possible (every participant would give a score of 5 on that question).
|
Score of 5:
|
Strongly Agree
|
|
Score of 4:
|
Agree
|
|
Score of 3:
|
Neutral
|
|
Score of 2:
|
Disagree
|
|
Score of 1:
|
Strongly Disagree
|
|
QUESTION FROM FORM
|
Average Score
|
|---|---|
| 1. The intended outcomes of this session were made clear. |
4.89
|
| 2. Speaker(s) communicated ideas clearly. |
5.00
|
| 3. My experience in this session increased my understanding of the material we discussed. |
4.44
|
| 4. The session content was relevant to my needs. |
4.56
|
| 5. The session met my expectations. |
4.89
|
| 6. My conceptual understanding of assessment was strengthened. |
4.78
|
| 7. The presenter(s) was (were) well prepared for the session. |
4.89
|
| 8. My understanding of how to incorporate existing work in the assessment process was increased. |
4.56
|
| 9. The length of the session was appropriate. |
4.56
|
| 10. The session meeting area provided an environment where I could focus on the task at hand. |
4.56
|
Please add any additional comments or suggestions: